Digital Stories

Truth & Beauty: The Pre-Raphaelites and the Old Masters


June 30–September 30, 2018

Young, ambitious, and idealistic, the seven artists who formed the Pre-Raphaelite Brotherhood aimed at nothing less than a revolution. They indicted the Royal Academy of Art (England’s dominant authority of artistic training and taste) for being repetitive and formulaic. To create their own style they embraced the art of the past. The leaders of the group—William Holman Hunt, Dante Gabriel Rossetti, and John Everett Millais—argued that early European art represented greater representational truth, originality, and beauty than did the late Renaissance masterpieces that were celebrated by the Royal Academy. With the support of John Ruskin, one of the most influential art critics of the time, the Pre-Raphaelite Brotherhood (PRB) became the most radical contemporary art movement of the Victorian period.

“Lady Lilith,” painted by Dante Gabriel Rossetti between 1866 and 1868.

Dante Gabriel Rossetti, Lady Lilith (animation by Fgreat Studio), 1866–1868 (altered 1872–1873). Oil on canvas, 39 × 34 in. (99.1 × 86.4 cm). Delaware Art Museum, Wilmington, Samuel and Mary R. Bancroft Memorial, 1935–29. © Delaware Art Museum

The Pre-Raphaelites lived in a period of intense change. At their founding in 1848, England was a global superpower. Queen Victoria was 29 years old and had been on the throne for 11 years (she would reign for another 53 years). Revolution and unrest were sweeping Europe, and in England the working class demonstrated for political reform. More broadly, over the course of their careers, members of the Pre-Raphaelite Brotherhood witnessed both the promise and the perils of industrialized society.

Queen Victoria and Prince Albert, 1854, five years after their marriage. Photo by Roger Fenton / Roger Fenton / Getty Images
Queen Victoria and Prince Albert, 1854.

Queen Victoria and Prince Albert, 1854, five years after their marriage. Photo by Roger Fenton / Roger Fenton / Getty Images

London under construction ca. 1869.
London under construction ca. 1869.

Site clearance for the construction of underground transportation at Queen Victoria Street, Blackfriars, London, ca. 1869. Photo by SSPL / Getty Images

In response to their increasingly modernizing world—and to counter what they viewed as the erosion of timeless ideals, such as truth and beauty, in art by the followers of Raphael (the “Raphaelites”)—the PRB studied art from the Middle Ages and early Renaissance. This exhibition juxtaposes for the first time works of the Pre-Raphaelite Brotherhood with those by old masters such as Jan van Eyck and Sandro Botticelli. Viewers can trace the lessons the Brotherhood learned from their predecessors, from painting techniques to the use of symbolism.

Revolutionaries

image credit

William Holman Hunt, The Hireling Shepherd, 1853. Oil on canvas laid down on panel, 12 x 18 in. (30.5 x 46 cm). The Makins Collection. The Makins Collection / Bridgeman Images

Go to Nature in all singleness of heart . . . rejecting nothing, selecting nothing, and scorning nothing: believing all things to be right and good, and rejoicing always in the truth.

John Ruskin, art critic, 1843

John Everett Millais, William Holman Hunt, and Dante Gabriel Rossetti met as students of the Royal Academy Schools. Their first meeting as core founding members of the Pre-Raphaelites was held in September 1848 at 83 Gower Street, the home of Millais’s parents. At the time, they ranged in age from nineteen to twenty-one. The additional founding members included: Frederic George Stephens, James Collinson, Thomas Woolner, and Dante Gabriel Rossetti’s brother, William Michael Rossetti.

The Germ: Thoughts towards Nature in Poetry, Literature, and Art (January 1850). Letterpress, 8 3/4 x 5 3/8 in. (22.2 x 14 cm). Published by Aylott & Jones, London. Collection of Joseph and Deborah Goldyne
The PRB created a journal that included poetry, short stories, and illustrations.

The Germ: Thoughts towards Nature in Poetry, Literature, and Art (January 1850). Letterpress, 8 3/4 x 5 3/8 in. (22.2 x 14 cm). Published by Aylott & Jones, London. Collection of Joseph and Deborah Goldyne

To rage against the tyranny of academic refinement, the PRB proposed to follow John Ruskin’s call to go to nature and rejoice in its truth. Hunt later recounted that “the first principle of Pre-Raphaelitism was to eschew all that was conventional in contemporary art.” Rossetti’s brother William, also a founding member, summarized their artistic intent as follows:

"1, To have genuine ideas to express; 2, to study Nature attentively, so as to know how to express them; 3, to sympathise with what is direct and serious and heartfelt in previous art, to the exclusion of what is conventional and self-parading and learned by rote; and 4, and most indispensable of all, to produce thoroughly good pictures and statues."

William Holman Hunt, John Everett Millais, 1853. Colored chalks on paper laid down on cardboard, 13 1/8 x 9 3/4 in. (33.2 x 24.8 cm). National Portrait Gallery, London, Given by Leopold George Esmond Morse in memory of his father, Sydney Morse, 1937, NPG 2914. © National Portrait Gallery, London

Millais entered the Royal Academy at age eleven as the youngest student in its history. He married Euphemia (“Effie”) Gray, after the annulment of her disastrous marriage to John Ruskin. In a true twist of fate, given his youthful rejection of all things academic, Millais joined the Royal Academy in 1853 and even became its president in 1896.

John Everett Millais, William Holman Hunt (detail), 1853. Graphite with some wash on cardboard, 9 1/4 x 7 1/2 in. (23.5 x 18.9 cm). National Portrait Gallery, London, Purchased, 1985, NPG 5834. © National Portrait Gallery, London

Hunt, the oldest founding member at the age of twenty-one, was from a modest background in London. He was married twice—first to Fanny Waugh and then, after her death, to her younger sister Edith. Extremely religious, he spent extended time in the Holy Land. Hunt believed he was the only member who remained true to the PRB’s mission.

Dante Gabriel Rossetti, Self-Portrait (detail), 1847. Graphite and white chalk, 8 1/8 x 6 5/8 in. (20.7 x 16.8 cm). National Portrait Gallery, London, Purchased, 1891, NPG 857. © National Portrait Gallery, London

Rossetti was charismatic but mercurial. His infatuations with the women he painted led to several turbulent love affairs: with his muse and eventual wife, the artist Elizabeth (“Lizzie”) Siddal; with his tempestuous mistress and occasional housekeeper, Fanny Cornforth; and with Jane Burden, who wed Rossetti’s protégé, William Morris.

A Manifesto in Action

The PRB’s application of their youthful ideals resulted in compositions such as Millais’s Mariana. The artist constructed a veritable world of details and textures, clearly demonstrating his skill as a painter, yet that was not his sole intent. Such exacting detail showed his ability to “study nature attentively” and to create a work that compelled the same of his viewer. Throughout the composition, Millais has left provocative visual puzzles for the viewer.

“Mariana,” painted by John Everett Millais in 1851.
“Mariana,” painted by John Everett Millais in 1851.

John Everett Millais, Mariana, 1850–1851. Oil on mahogany panel, 23 1/2 x 19 1/2 in. (59.7 x 49.5 cm). Tate, London, accepted by HM Government in lieu of tax and allocated to the Tate Gallery 1999, T07553. © Tate

Inspired by Alfred, Lord Tennyson’s poem Mariana, which was based on a character in Shakespeare’s play Measure for Measure, this work was exhibited by Millais at the Royal Academy in 1851, just one year after Tennyson became poet laureate. When it was first displayed, the work was accompanied by the following stanza:

She only said, “my life is dreary, he cometh not,” she said. She said, “I am aweary, aweary, I would that I were dead!”

Tennyson, poet, 1830

Questioning the Academy

The revolutionary aspects of Mariana can easily escape the attention of the twenty-first century viewer. However, when compared with paintings in the period’s reigning style, the contrast is striking. The work of Sir Joshua Reynolds, the first president of the Royal Academy, still defined its teaching philosophy although he had been dead for more than half a century.

Joshua Reynolds, Anne, Viscountess Townsend, Later Marchioness Townshend, 1779–1780
This painting represents the dominant style that the PRB revolted against.

Joshua Reynolds, Anne, Viscountess Townsend, Later Marchioness Townshend, 1779–1780. Oil on canvas, 95 x 58 in. (241.3 x 147.3 cm). Fine Arts Museums of San Francisco, Roscoe and Margaret Oakes Collection, 75.2.13

In Anne, Viscountess Townsend, Later Marchioness Townshend, on view in the British gallery at the Legion of Honor, you can see why members of the PRB sarcastically referred to the artist as “Sir Sloshua.” To their eyes the brushstrokes lacked precision and the color palette was muted. The initial critical attacks against the PRB conformed to the prevailing tastes of the time and reprimanded the young collective for being too truthful in their choice of angular figures and their minute, naturalistic, details.

  • A portrait by William Holman Hunt painted in 1858.

    William Holman Hunt, Henry Wentworth Monk, 1858. Oil on canvas, 21 x 26 1/2 in. (53.3 x 67.3 cm). National Gallery of Canada, Ottawa, Purchased 1911, no. 39. © The National Gallery of Canada

  • A portrait by Lucas Cranach the Younger painted in 1545.

    Lucas Cranach the Younger, Portrait of a Man, 1545. Oil on parchment on pine panel, 12 1/2 x 9 7/8 in. (31.8 x 25.1 cm). Fine Arts Museums of San Francisco, Museum purchase, M. H. de Young Endowment Fund, 43.9.3

Although John Ruskin found the name of the Pre-Raphaelite Brotherhood to be “unfortunate and somewhat ludicrous,” he championed their efforts to break from the academy and provided the PRB with connections to collectors over their careers. In an early article he stated, “They know little of ancient paintings who suppose the works of these young artists to resemble them.” In short, viewers who saw the PRB as copying the old masters did not look close enough.

William Holman Hunt’s portrait of Henry Wentworth Monk exemplifies Ruskin’s critique. The artist’s exacting details and nuanced handling of light create the illusion of the past. However, Hunt has juxtaposed a volume of the New Testament with a copy of the London Times, emphatically placing the portrait within the Victorian era.

Studying the Old Masters

image credit

Jan van Eyck, The Annunciation, ca. 1434/1436. Oil on canvas transferred from wood panel, 35 1/2 x 13 1/2 in. (90.2 x 34.1 cm). National Gallery of Art, Washington, DC, Andrew W. Mellon Collection, 1937.1.39. Courtesy of the National Gallery of Art, Washington

Artists were prepared to adopt the role of pupils—pupils, moreover, to masters whose authority was as yet unproven, artists of the past who had not yet entered a canon still in the process of formation.

Elizabeth Prettejohn, art historian, 2017

Individually distinct, the styles of the PRB artists share numerous traits, which they learned through their close study of the old masters such as Jan van Eyck, Hans Memling, and Sandro Botticelli. Every member of the group rejected painting with bright highlights and deep shadows, a technique called chiaroscuro. They also painted on a white underlayer, which enhanced their palette of brilliant, jewel-toned colors. This style contrasted with sfumato, painting in gradually shifting tones to create hazy, soft outlines, a technique prominent among late Italian Renaissance masters and sanctioned by Reynolds.

A painting of the Virgin and Child from the 15th or 16th century.

Master of the Saint Lucy Legend, Virgin and Child Enthroned with Angels (animation by Fgreat Studio), 15th–16th century. Oil and tempera on wood panel, 31 1/4 x 20 1/2 in. (79.4 x 52.1 cm). Fine Arts Museums of San Francisco, Museum purchase, Mildred Anna Williams Collection, 1953.38

Tracing the connections between the old masters and the PRB rebels, we discover art history as a developing discipline in the nineteenth century. During the Victorian era, connoisseurs and scholars were actively assembling the world-famous collections we know today. The most significant acquisition of this kind for the PRB was the 1842 purchase by the National Gallery of the Arnolfini Portrait by the Netherlandish artist Jan van Eyck.

Jan van Eyck, Arnolfini Portrait, 1434. Oil on oak panel, 32 3/8 x 23 5/8 in. (82.2 x 60 cm). National Gallery, London, Bought 1842, NG186. © National Gallery, London / Art Resource
Jan van Eyck’s famous “Arnolfini Portrait,” painted in 1434.

Jan van Eyck, Arnolfini Portrait, 1434. Oil on oak panel, 32 3/8 x 23 5/8 in. (82.2 x 60 cm). National Gallery, London, Bought 1842, NG186. © National Gallery, London / Art Resource

The angular postures, bright jewel-toned colors, and highly symbolic interior of the Arnolfini Portrait riveted the PRB artists, as there were few paintings like it on public view. The painting remains so treasured today that it never leaves the National Gallery in London. Northern art (from the Netherlands and Germany) served as a near revelation to English audiences. Queen Victoria’s German husband, Prince Albert, was one of the most proactive private collectors and promoters of this art in Britain, even helping to organize and supply loans for local exhibitions. Notably, in 1857, he supported an exhibition held in Manchester entitled “Art Treasures,” where the organizers compared early Northern art with early Italian art, installing examples from each school on opposite walls.

Sandro Botticelli, Portrait of a Lady Known as Smeralda Bandinelli, 1470–1480. Tempera on panel, 25 7/8 x 16 1/8 in. (65.7 x 41 cm). Victoria and Albert Museum, London, Bequeathed by Constantine Alexander Ionides, CAI.100. © Victoria and Albert Museum, London
This Botticelli painting was once owned by Dante Gabriel Rossetti.

Sandro Botticelli, Portrait of a Lady Known as Smeralda Bandinelli, 1470–1480. Tempera on panel, 25 7/8 x 16 1/8 in. (65.7 x 41 cm). Victoria and Albert Museum, London, Bequeathed by Constantine Alexander Ionides, CAI.100. © Victoria and Albert Museum, London

When the PRB formed, none of its founding members had yet traveled abroad. Rossetti and Hunt took their first study trip in 1849 to Paris and Bruges, where they made many discoveries of Northern art. The Brotherhood also amassed their knowledge of old masters by visiting the National Gallery, the British Museum, and private collections, including that of John Ruskin. Reflecting the nascent art market for Northern and early Italian art, some of the artists even collected their own works. Most notably, Rossetti purchased—for only 20 pounds—Botticelli’s Portrait of a Lady Known as Smeralda Bandinelli, which he closely studied and used for inspiration for his own allegorical portraits.

In fact they ought not to be compared to any Italians; since the Italians aimed at beauty . . . at grace and dignity—of all which our Pre-Raphaelites have no notion.

“The Art Journal,” 1859

The PRB used copies such as this watercolor reproduction of Botticelli’s “Birth of Venus” as source materials.
The PRB used copies such as this watercolor reproduction of Botticelli’s “Birth of Venus” as source materials.

Cesare Mariannecci, Copy after the “Birth of Venus” by Sandro Botticelli in the Uffizi, Florence (detail), 1868. Commissioned and published by the Arundel Society. Watercolor, 19 1/8 x 27 5/8 in. (48.5 x 70.1 cm). Victoria and Albert Museum, London, E.35–1995. © Victoria and Albert Museum, London

Given the expense of international travel and the limited opportunities in London to view firsthand the art that inspired them, the Brotherhood took advantage of high-quality reproductions and early photographs of rare artworks. Copies of such paintings as Botticelli’s Primavera and The Birth of Venus served as source material. The burgeoning interest in replica prints led to the founding of groups such as the Arundel Society, created the same year as the Pre-Raphaelite Brotherhood and dedicated to the publication of reproductions to promote knowledge of early European art.

Ideals of Truth and Beauty

image credit

Dante Gabriel Rossetti, Veronica Veronese, 1872. Oil on canvas, 43 x 35 in. (109.2 x 88.9 cm). Delaware Art Museum, Wilmington, Samuel and Mary R. Bancroft Memorial, 1935–28. © Delaware Art Museum

What did the Pre-Raphaelite Brotherhood learn from the different periods they studied?

  • “A Crowned Virgin Martyr,” created by Bernardo Daddi circa 1340.

    Bernardo Daddi, A Crowned Virgin Martyr (Saint Catherine of Alexandria), ca. 1340. Tempera and gold leaf on wood panel, 24 1/4 x 12 in. (61.6 x 30.5 cm). Fine Arts Museums of San Francisco, Gift of the Samuel H. Kress Foundation, 61.44.1

  • “Beata Beatrix,” painted by Dante Gabriel Rossetti in 1871 or 1872.

    Dante Gabriel Rossetti, Beata Beatrix, 1871/1872. Oil on canvas, 34 1/2 x 27 1/4 in. (87.5 x 69.3 cm); predella: 10 3/8 x 27 1/4 in. (26.5 x 69.2 cm). Art Institute of Chicago, Charles L. Hutchinson Collection, 1925.722. The Art Institute of Chicago / Art Resource, NY

Medieval Art
300–1400

The PRB’s passion for the medieval period was fueled by Ruskin’s writings. He envisioned the Middle Ages as a time when art and life were interconnected, when craftsmen worked together to create art that conveyed truthful ideals, at once personally meaningful and socially beneficial. He believed returning to these principles was the only escape from brute capitalism and the toll it took on Britain’s social, cultural, spiritual, and environmental life.

  • Jan van Eyck’s “The Annunciation,” painted circa 1435.

    Jan van Eyck, The Annunciation (detail), ca. 1434/1436. Oil on canvas transferred from wood panel, 35 1/2 x 13 1/2 in. (90.2 x 34.1 cm). National Gallery of Art, Washington, DC, Andrew W. Mellon Collection, 1937.1.39. Courtesy of the National Gallery of Art, Washington

  • “Mariana,” painted by Sir John Everett Millais from 1850 to 1851.

    John Everett Millais, Mariana, 1850–1851. Oil on mahogany panel, 23 1/2 x 19 1/2 in. (59.7 x 49.5 cm). Tate, London, Accepted by HM Government in lieu of tax and allocated to the Tate Gallery 1999, T07553. © Tate

Northern Renaissance Art
(Netherlandish and German)
1400–1500

In the work of Northern Renaissance artists, the Brotherhood admired the luminosity and durability of their oil technique as well as their incandescent colors, exacting detail, and the symbolic depiction of everyday objects. Van Eyck provided the greatest source of inspiration.

  • “Idealized Portrait of a Lady” by Botticelli circa 1475.

    Sandro Botticelli, Idealized Portrait of a Lady (Portrait of Simonetta Vespucci as Nymph), ca. 1475. Tempera on wood panel, 32 1/4 x 21 1/4 in. (81.8 x 54 cm). Städel Museum, Frankfurt, Inv. No. 936. © Städelsches Kunstinstitut, Frankfurt-am-Main, Germany / Bridgeman Images

  • Detail from Stanhope’s “Love and the Maiden,” 1877.

    John Roddam Spencer Stanhope, Love and the Maiden (detail), 1877. Oil and gold leaf on canvas, 55 1/2 x 81 in. (141 x 205.7 cm). Fine Arts Museums of San Francisco, Museum purchase, European Art Trust Fund, Grover A. Magnin Bequest Fund and Dorothy Spreckels Munn Bequest Fund, 2002.176

Early Italian Art
1400–1500

Early Italian artists such as Fra Angelico and Sandro Botticelli captivated the PRB with the sincerity of their painting style. They especially admired Botticelli for his close observation of nature. He also combined sacred and secular imagery, creating compositions that conveyed a sense of both pleasure and melancholy.

  • Raphael’s “Self-Portrait,” painted in 1506.

    Raphael, Self-Portrait, 1506. Oil on canvas, 18 5/8 x 13 in. (47.5 x 33 cm). Gallerie degli Uffizi, Inv. 1890, no. 1706. Gallerie degli Uffizi, Florence / Bridgeman Images

  • Photograph by the female photographer, Julia Margaret Cameron.

    Julia Margaret Cameron, Hardinge Hay Cameron (detail), 1864. Albumen silver print, 9 3/4 x 7 1/2 in. (24.8 x 19.1 cm). Fine Arts Museums of San Francisco, Achenbach Foundation for Graphic Arts, museum purchase, ArtMrkt Fund, 2014.14

The Time of Raphael
1483–1520

In naming themselves the Pre-Raphaelite Brotherhood, the young collective intended to reject not Raphael himself but rather the formulaic results of his many assistants and followers, the “Raphaelites.” According to the PRB these artists slavishly followed rules that resulted in contorted compositions that lacked originality.

  • Paolo Veronese’s “Lucrezia,” painted circa 1580/1583.

    Paolo Veronese, Lucrezia, ca. 1580/1583. Oil on canvas, 43 x 35 1/2 in. (109.5 x 90.5 cm). Kunsthistorisches Museum, Vienna, Inv. no. Gemäldegalerie, 1561. © Kunsthistorisches Museum, Wien

  • Dante Gabriel Rossetti’s “Veronica Veronese,” painted in 1872.

    Dante Gabriel Rossetti, Veronica Veronese (detail), 1872. Oil on canvas, 42 3/8 x 33 3/4 in. (107.6 x 85.7 cm). Delaware Art Museum, Wilmington, Samuel and Mary R. Bancroft Memorial, 1935–28. © Delaware Art Museum

High and Late Italian Renaissance Art
1500–1600

Although they scorned Raphael’s followers, later in their careers the PRB did study artists after Raphael whom they deemed to be fully original. Rossetti’s later works are heavily indebted to Venetian artists such as Titian, Paolo Veronese, and Palma Vecchio. Compositions by these painters share sumptuous textures, graceful bodies, and a scale of nearly life size.

  • Jane (Burden) Morris posed as Proserpine.

    Dante Gabriel Rossetti, Proserpine, 1878. Watercolor with body color on paper mounted on wood panel, 30 1/2 x 14 3/4 in. (77.5 x 37.5 cm). Agnew’s, London. © Agnew’s Gallery, London

  • Elizabeth (Siddal) Rossetti posed as “Beata Beatrix.”

    Dante Gabriel Rossetti, Beata Beatrix, 1871/1872. Oil on canvas, 34 1/2 x 27 1/4 in. (87.5 x 69.3 cm); predella: 10 3/8 x 27 1/4 in. (26.5 x 69.2 cm). Art Institute of Chicago, Charles L. Hutchinson Collection, 1925.722. The Art Institute of Chicago / Art Resource, NY

  • Georgiana Burne-Jones.

    Frederick Hollyer, Georgiana (née Macdonald), Lady Burne-Jones, ca. 1882. Platinotype cabinet card, 5 5/8 x 3 1/2 in. (14.2 x 8.9 cm). National Portrait Gallery, London, Given by Robert R. Steele, 1939, NPG x4907. © National Portrait Gallery, London

  • Evelyn (Pickering) De Morgan.

    Luigi Montabone, Evelyn De Morgan, ca. 1898. Albumen cabinet card, 5 1/2 x 4 in. (13.9 cm x 10.2 cm). National Portrait Gallery, London, Given by Robert R. Steele, 1939, NPG x28077. © National Portrait Gallery, London

The Pre-Raphaelite Women

From the outset, women surrounded the Pre-Raphaelite Brotherhood and actively participated in shaping the movement. However, women living in this period were constrained by the Victorian social norms. The talents of female artists featured in this exhibition, such as Elizabeth “Lizzie” Siddal and Evelyn De Morgan, were historically undervalued in contrast to those of their male counterparts. Early in their careers, artists of the PRB generally relied on family members to serve as models, such as Rossetti’s two sisters, Christina and Maria Francesca Rossetti. By 1852 Millais, Hunt, and Rossetti were working with models from lower- to working-class backgrounds. In many cases only fragmentary evidence remains to provide general outlines of these women’s lives.

The Art of Translation

image credit

John Roddam Spencer Stanhope, Love and the Maiden, 1877. Oil and gold leaf on canvas, 55 1/2 x 81 in. (141 x 205.7 cm). Fine Arts Museums of San Francisco, Museum purchase, European Art Trust Fund, Grover A. Magnin Bequest Fund and Dorothy Spreckels Munn Bequest Fund, 2002.176

At the heart of the project outlined by the PRB lies a central question: how do artists study the art of the past to revitalize the art of the present? In the Victorian era, the tradition of copying masterpieces was a tried-and-true teaching technique. What made the Pre-Raphaelites revolutionary was their focus on old masters who had largely been overlooked by the art establishment. Their ambition also differentiated their approach. They aspired to be adept translators and not rote copyists, borrowing their predecessors’ styles to create modern works. Having translated Italian poet Dante Alighieri’s La vita nuova into English, Rossetti was well acquainted with the elusive challenge of preserving the beauty of verse within a new context. Of the process, he wrote:

"[The translator’s path] is like that of Aladdin through the enchanted vaults: many are the precious fruits and flowers which he must pass by unheeded in search for the lamp alone; happy if at last, when brought to light, it does not prove that his old lamp has been exchanged for a new one—glittering indeed to the eye, but scarcely of the same virtue nor with the same genius at its summons." —Dante Gabriel Rossetti, artist, 1861

Stanhope’s “Love and the Maiden,” 1877.

John Roddam Spencer Stanhope, Love and the Maiden (animation by Fgreat Studio), 1877. Oil and gold leaf on canvas, 55 1/2 x 81 in. (141 x 205.7 cm). Fine Arts Museums of San Francisco, Museum purchase, European Art Trust Fund, Grover A. Magnin Bequest Fund and Dorothy Spreckels Munn Bequest Fund, 2002.176

Emilio Costantini, Copy after “La Primavera” by Sandro Botticelli in the Uffizi, Florence, ca. 1860s–1880s. Commissioned and published by the Arundel Society. Watercolor, 20 7/8 x 32 1/2 in. (53.2 x 82.6 cm). Victoria and Albert Museum, London, E.34–1995. © Victoria and Albert Museum, London
Copy of Botticelli’s “La Primavera.”

Emilio Costantini, Copy after “La Primavera” by Sandro Botticelli in the Uffizi, Florence, ca. 1860s–1880s. Commissioned and published by the Arundel Society. Watercolor, 20 7/8 x 32 1/2 in. (53.2 x 82.6 cm). Victoria and Albert Museum, London, E.34–1995. © Victoria and Albert Museum, London

To achieve the translation that they aspired to, Rossetti and other PRB artists did not slavishly replicate key parts of a single composition but rather assembled different elements to create their own original works. In Love and the Maiden, painted in 1877, Stanhope (who owned a villa outside Florence) boldly displays the lessons he learned through his exacting studies of Botticelli’s masterpieces, including The Birth of Venus and Primavera. The postures of the figures, the painstaking attention to nature, and allusions to ancient mythology create a strong link between the two artists. However, Stanhope refused to quote Botticelli exactly. His stylistic interweaving of Botticelli’s elements into his composition encourages the viewer to look more closely at both Stanhope’s work and that of the master he diligently studied.

John Roddam Spencer Stanhope, Love and the Maiden (detail), 1877. Oil and gold leaf on canvas, 55 1/2 x 81 in. (141 x 205.7 cm). Fine Arts Museums of San Francisco, Museum purchase, European Art Trust Fund, Grover A. Magnin Bequest Fund and Dorothy Spreckels Munn Bequest Fund, 2002.176

In place of Botticelli’s three nearly identical graces, Stanhope placed four differentiated figures.

John Roddam Spencer Stanhope, Love and the Maiden (detail), 1877. Oil and gold leaf on canvas, 55 1/2 x 81 in. (141 x 205.7 cm). Fine Arts Museums of San Francisco, Museum purchase, European Art Trust Fund, Grover A. Magnin Bequest Fund and Dorothy Spreckels Munn Bequest Fund, 2002.176

Botticelli articulated floral detail but left the earth undefined. Here, Stanhope carefully depicted an eroding terrain and gnarled tree roots.

John Roddam Spencer Stanhope, Love and the Maiden (detail), 1877. Oil and gold leaf on canvas, 55 1/2 x 81 in. (141 x 205.7 cm). Fine Arts Museums of San Francisco, Museum purchase, European Art Trust Fund, Grover A. Magnin Bequest Fund and Dorothy Spreckels Munn Bequest Fund, 2002.176

Stanhope painted his initials as if carved into the stump upon which Love kneels, saving himself from the translator’s fate of invisibility.

Beyond the Canvas

image credit

Saint Peter (detail), ca. 1894–1895. Designed by Edward Burne-Jones. Manufactured by Morris & Co. Pot-metal and clear glass, vitreous paint, and silver stain, 39 1/2 x 14 1/2 in. (100.3 x 36.8 cm). Private collection

William Morris (top right) with Edward Burne-Jones (center) and their families. Photo by © Historical Picture Archive / CORBIS / Corbis via Getty Images
William Morris (top right) and his longtime collaborator Edward Burne-Jones (center) appear with their families, including Burne-Jones’s father (top left), Georgiana Burne-Jones (lower left), and Jane Morris (lower, second from right).

William Morris (top right) with Edward Burne-Jones (center) and their families. © Historical Picture Archive / CORBIS / Corbis via Getty Images

For many of the Pre-Raphaelite Brotherhood artists and their collectors, paintings alone could not evoke the past they wished to revive. They created domestic worlds infused with medieval-inspired furniture, books, wallpaper, stained-glass windows, and tapestries. At the height of the PRB’s popularity, the demand for domestic goods gave rise to an entire industry headed by William Morris and Edward-Burne Jones, both protégés of Dante Gabriel Rossetti.

The Combat of the Virtues and the Vices from The Redemption of Man series, ca. 1535. Wool, silk; tapestry weave, 164 x 320 in. (416.6 x 812.8 cm). Fine Arts Museums of San Francisco, gift of The William Randolph Hearst Foundation, 54.14.1
A tapestry from “The Redemption of Man” series, circa 1535.

The Combat of the Virtues and the Vices from The Redemption of Man series, ca. 1535. Wool, silk; tapestry weave, 164 x 320 in. (416.6 x 812.8 cm). Fine Arts Museums of San Francisco, gift of The William Randolph Hearst Foundation, 54.14.1

Bird wall hanging, 1878–1881. Designed by William Morris; manufactured by Morris & Co. Wool; doublecloth (jacquard woven) 51 x 82 1/2 in. (129.5 x 209.6 cm). Fine Arts Museums of San Francisco, Museum purchase, Art Trust Fund, 1996.47
Wall hanging designed by William Morris and manufactured by Morris & Co.

Bird wall hanging, 1878–1881. Designed by William Morris; manufactured by Morris & Co. Wool; doublecloth (jacquard woven) 51 x 82 1/2 in. (129.5 x 209.6 cm). Fine Arts Museums of San Francisco, Museum purchase, Art Trust Fund, 1996.47

Friends who met in college, Morris and Burne-Jones first collaborated on furniture designs. As their careers progressed, Morris dedicated himself to reviving lost trades. He passionately studied old-master tapestries and taught himself the high-warp technique, the method favored in medieval and Renaissance workshops.

  • Edward Burne-Jones, Love in a Mist, page i from The Flower Book, 1905. Published by The Fine Art Society, London. Collotype with watercolor additions, 12 3/4 x 10 5/8 in. (32.4 x 27 cm). Collection of Ann and Gordon Getty

  • Edward Burne-Jones, Adder’s Tongue, page viii from The Flower Book, 1905. Published by The Fine Art Society, London. Collotype with watercolor additions, 12 3/4 x 10 5/8 in. (32.4 x 27 cm). Collection of Ann and Gordon Getty

  • Edward Burne-Jones, Witches’ Tree, page xv from The Flower Book, 1905. Published by The Fine Art Society, London. Collotype with watercolor additions, 12 3/4 x 10 5/8 in. (32.4 x 27 cm). Collection of Ann and Gordon Getty

  • Edward Burne-Jones, White Garden, page xxxiv from The Flower Book, 1905. Published by The Fine Art Society, London. Collotype with watercolor additions, 12 3/4 x 10 5/8 in. (32.4 x 27 cm). Collection of Ann and Gordon Getty

  • Edward Burne-Jones, Day and Night, page xxxviii from The Flower Book, 1905. Published by The Fine Art Society, London. Collotype with watercolor additions, 12 3/4 x 10 5/8 in. (32.4 x 27 cm). Collection of Ann and Gordon Getty

In addition to his other acclaimed artistic pursuits, Burne-Jones studied illuminated manuscripts and French emblem books. Inspired by the latter, he created The Flower Book, which was published by the artist’s wife after his death. This volume included thirty-eight watercolors that evoke traditional floral names in ways that are sometimes recognizable and at other times obscure.

Kehinde Wiley, 2018. Photo by Dimitrios Kambouris / Getty Images
Kehinde Wiley, 2018.

Kehinde Wiley, 2018. Photo by Dimitrios Kambouris / Getty Images

Kehinde Wiley: Empowering the Present

The artistic revolution represented by the Pre-Raphaelite Brotherhood offers a resounding answer to the question, Where and how do artists find inspiration? Contemporary artists similarly wrestle with how, when, and why to engage with the art of the past. The potential impact and power of this debate crystallizes in the work of Kehinde Wiley—whom President Obama selected to paint his official portrait. Wiley translates the poses and settings from old-master paintings to underscore contemporary social issues. In the nineteenth century, the Pre-Raphaelite Brotherhood worked with an art-historical canon that was in flux; this understanding that art history is not fixed invites artists and viewers today to question how and why certain artists are elevated over others.

Generally, I try to create a place of disorientation, as a way to upset the natural balance that the viewer may have when they look at one of my images. What I love in art is that it takes known combinations and reorders them in a way that sheds light on something that they have never seen before or allows to consider the world in a slightly different way.

Kehinde Wiley, artist, 2015